Turns out according to her site, her first few years are not exactly compliant
with fed law.
if you go to her portfolio on her new revamped site you will find that most
of the sets for the first two and some from the third year have been removed explaining
they were not legal.
So anybody who has a set form 2002 on back, may now be in possession of illegal
You know i just went back and read the 2257 Legal Standards,
and it lists a lot of stuff that could have caused this site to remove these
photos, it seems this law addresses the keeping of performer’s records. So
please understand that although its speculated here that the reason the photos were
pulled was due to age, it could have been something else.